🔗 Share this article

Australia's bold move to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Politicians, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this approach will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

European Movement

In Europe, a rising number of nations are considering comparable restrictions.

• Denmark has stated a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that phones and platforms are "taking away our youngsters' innocence". A law is expected to be passed soon.
• Norway is planning to implement a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield young people from the "influence of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Officials have indicated that an similar ban remains "an options on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has asked parliament to enact a law lifting the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has suggested a related action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The authorities in The Netherlands has recommended families to prevent their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has adopted a advisory resolution demanding a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it warns of the "compulsive" nature of these apps, the move does not create binding law.

"An effective age limit is a solid first step," said a leading MEP driving the resolution.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is off the table" but stressing any action must be "based on robust data".

Last year, momentum gathered behind a legislative effort to introduce limits on social media use by minors, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the government vowed to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. An organization set up by the relatives of a young person who died after being exposed to disturbing platform posts contends that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when users reach the legal age.

"This ban is a answer to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are secure and fit for young users," commented a prominent peer.

America: A State-by-State Picture

In the United States, action is primarily happening at the state government level due to national stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a measure barring those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it faces legal challenges.
• Virginia has approved a regulation limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media time per day, with any further time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted bills requiring parental consent for minors to open social media profiles.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from some individuals to mimic the Australian lead, a US-wide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Outlook

Beyond these regions, other countries are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for under-16s starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the required age for one major platform to 16.

But, international agencies adopt a more measured stance. A major UN agency has cautioned that age-based restrictions carry risks and "might backfire". The organization points out that online platforms can be a "lifeline" for isolated youth and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

Even as this worldwide discussion unfolds, the policies of this nation and others demonstrate that policymakers globally are less and less willing to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.